News
Jury Verdict
Congratulations to Steven Hupp and Ronald Margolis for obtaining a Defense Verdict in a Nursing Home wrongful death case tried in Franklin County Common Pleas Court.
Plaintiff’s decedent was a 73-year-old resident who recently had all of her teeth removed to obtain dentures. She was then placed on a mechanical soft diet. A speech pathology consult cleared this resident to eat independently because she demonstrated an ability to understand the appropriate texture of food for her.
On October 15, 2022, the resident was served ham that was ground to the consistency for a mechanical soft diet. While eating lunch, the resident began choking. The Heimlich maneuver was unsuccessful, and she suffered a cardiac arrest. EMS responded quickly, suctioned numerous pieces of ham from her airway. EMS could not intubate the resident due to the food in her throat. They took her to the Emergency Room. The Emergency Medicine attending physician described numerous small pieces of food above and below her vocal cords but was able to intubate her. After she was pronounced dead, an ER nurse, who acted as a scribe, wrote a note stating: “Unchewed, not ground golf ball size of ham to be found on floor that was removed from patient’s airway.”
Plaintiff claimed that the resident was negligently served ham that was too large to qualify as mechanically soft. The facilities’ cook strenuously denied that she was served ham that was not ground to the correct size. The plaintiff’s expert was an Internal Medicine physician who had not seen patients in nursing homes for the past seven years.
The defense presented experts in Geriatrics and Emergency Medicine/Prehospital Medicine. The E.M. witness was nationally recognized as an expert in airway management. The defense established that patients over age 65 have a seven times greater risk of choking and patients who lack any teeth are at even greater risk of choking.
During closing argument, plaintiff’s counsel asked the jury for $14 Million dollars on the wrongful death claim and between $10 and $24 Million dollars for the pain and suffering claim.
The jury returned their 8-0 verdict on the claim for negligence after one hour of deliberations. The jury clearly believed that the resident unfortunately choked on properly prepared food.
Jury Verdict
Steven J. Hupp
Ronald A. Margolis
News
Sixth District Court of Appeals in a unanimous decision holds that the noneconomic damages cap on catastrophic injuries in medical negligence actions is Constitutional
On December 12, 2025, board certified appellate specialist Doug Leak obtained a unanimous decision from the Sixth District Court of Appeals in Toledo, Ohio. The Sixth District Court held that the $500,000 medical negligence cap on noneconomic damages for catastrophic injuries is Constitutional. Mr. Leak successfully obtained a reversal of the Common Pleas Court's refusal to apply the cap. As a result of the Sixth District's decision, the application of the cap will reduce the jury's verdict from $5.152 million to $1.152 million.
This decision from the Sixth District Court of Appeals will have statewide implications beneficial to the defense bar in applying the caps in medical negligence actions.
Madison L. Bear
Douglas Leak
It is with great pleasure that Hupp Margolis & Leak announces that Madison L. Bear has been named a Partner in the firm. Madison officially commences her new role today. Madison has proven to be a skilled trial attorney. Her intelligence, hard work and dedication to our clients have earned her this well-deserved achievement. (October 1, 2024)
Steven Hupp and Ronald Margolis obtained a Defense Verdict in a medical malpractice case tried in Mahoning County Common Pleas Court.
Plaintiff underwent laparoscopic surgery for pelvic floor prolapse. During insufflation of the abdomen with the Veress needle her aorta was punctured, resulting in blood loss, conversion to open procedure and an aortic repair.
Plaintiff's expert from Georgetown University testified the aortic puncture was caused by substandard surgical technique. Specifically, Plaintiff's expert was critical of the surgeon's second attempt at placing the Veress needle after the first attempt failed.
The defense expert from Weil Cornell Medical Center testified the injury is a known and recognized complication of the surgery and as in this case occurs without surgical negligence. The defense expert testified that there was no reason for the surgeon not to make a second attempt at Veress needle placement.
The jury returned their verdict within 1 hour of deliberations. (January 31, 2025)